Facebook quietly pays off the biggest political scandal in tech history – AlterNet

But the New Mexico penalty was for statements Facebook made that deceived users about data privacy and its response to Cambridge Analytica – not for the harm caused by how the harvested data was used. Those harms are alleged to include exploiting psychological vulnerabilities, targeting people’s fears and discouraging them from voting. I’m a political communication scholar who studies propaganda, surveillance and information warfare. My research helped expose the Cambridge Analytica scandal through U.K. newspaper The Guardian’s reporting on whistelblower accounts and the evidence I uncovered. That evidence was submitted to parliamentary and congressional investigations. I have followed the unfolding legal cases closely. My takeaway from a decade of litigation is that Facebook has been penalized for misleading users and regulators about its data practices and its response to the Cambridge Analytica scandal. But I would contend that the company has largely escaped accountability for the underlying political exploitation of that data. Investigative failures The failure to bring cases around harms may be partly due to earlier failures to fully investigate the data misuse. The Senate Intelligence Committee’s investigation into Russian interference in the 2016 presidential election encompassed Cambridge Analytica. However, the committee stated in its final report that it
Read More