Photo by Lia Lora | The Triangle Both the good and the bad that fans have come to expect from controversial director, Emerald Fennel, went full-frontal in “Wuthering Heights” (2026). Fennell’s third film, “Wuthering Heights” is a disgusting movie, or one that is absolutely moving, especially if the viewer happens to be 14. It has no sense of historical accuracy, cultural sensitivity, or faithfulness to its source material. Instead it has something else, something movies rarely have anymore: absolute earnestness. The movie makes its plans to violate the original story known from the very first scene with Fennell’s own touch of perverse self-destruction. “Wuthering Heights” makes no attempt to be faithful to the novel it is based on. Instead, it dedicates itself to capturing the experience Fennell had reading it for the first time as a young teenager. For fans of movies like “Twilight,” this is one of those rare blends of sincerity and camp that catches viewers off guard. For viewers who are fans of costume, incredible set design, and Charli XCX, “Wuthering Heights” has all they can ask for. For fans of the novel “Wuthering Heights,” this is not for you. Just like Kathy and Heathcliff, the movie
Read More