Pennsylvania AG’s undercover Snapchat probe, filed August 25 in Philadelphia, targets the app’s 13+ rating as legally false A new iPhone. A fake birthday. A Snapchat account set up to mimic a 13-year-old. Within the normal flow of the app — no hacking, no workarounds — an investigator from Pennsylvania’s Office of Attorney General documented cannabis rolling videos, someone mixing and drinking spirits on camera, captions using opioid-related slang, and paid ads for a streaming service carrying explicit sexual clips. These findings raise serious child safety concerns that echo industry-wide debates over age verification and platform accountability. That account became the backbone of a lawsuit filed August 25, 2026 , in Philadelphia Court of Common Pleas. What the “13-Year-Old” Account Actually Saw The gap between Snap’s self-reported content labels and what the test account actually encountered is the factual heart of the case. When Snap lists Snapchat on Apple’s App Store, it answers a content-rating questionnaire in its own words. The result: a 13+ rating describing “infrequent/mild” sexual content, drug and alcohol references, and mature themes. Google Play and Microsoft’s store carry a matching “T for Teen.” All three ratings reflect Snap’s self-reported disclosures. The complaint argues “frequent” exposure directly
Read More










